How did we get to April 15th as tax filing date?

Swatee Kulkarni

Today is April 15th, a day marked in the calendars of millions of Americans not for festivities or celebrations, but as Tax Filing Day. This annual deadline for submitting individual tax returns to the federal, state and city government carries with it a blend of stress, relief, and, for some, the anticipation of a potential refund. But how did April 15th come to be the date?

The history of taxation in the United States is as old as the country itself, intertwined with its fight for independence, the shaping of its federal structure, and its growth into a global leader not just economically but in wars and peace. The origins of Tax Filing Day and the income tax system reveal a complex narrative that reflects changing economic conditions, political ideologies, and societal needs. From temporary measures implemented to fund wars to permanent fixtures aimed at redistributing wealth and funding government programs, the journey of taxation in the U.S. is a fascinating story of adaptation and evolution.

Taxation begins in the colonial period, where various forms of taxation were levied by the colonies themselves, often sparking discontent that would fuel the flames of revolution. However, it wasn’t until the Civil War that the federal government would impose its first income tax to support the Union’s war efforts. This was a temporary measure, eventually leading to a constitutional crisis that questioned the federal government’s power to tax incomes. The resolution came in the form of the 16th Amendment, ratified in 1913, which solidified the federal government’s right to tax individual incomes without apportioning it among the states.

As the United States faced new challenges and entered different eras—through two World Wars, the Great Depression, and the dynamic economic landscape of the 20th and 21st centuries—the tax system underwent significant changes. Tax rates fluctuated, tax brackets were adjusted, and the tax code became an increasingly complex document reflecting the priorities of the times. Each amendment and reform brought with it debates about equity, economic efficiency, and the role of government in regulating the economy and supporting its citizens.

The choice of April 15th as Tax Day is a reflection of the government’s attempt to balance operational efficiency with taxpayer convenience. While the deadline has become a fixed point in the American calendar, it continues to be the subject of both anticipation and dread for many taxpayers each year.

History of Tax Filing date(s)

Revenue Act of 1913: After the ratification of the 16th Amendment in 1913, which authorized the federal government to impose an income tax, the Revenue Act of 1913 set March 1st as the original deadline for tax filing. This date was set for taxpayers to file their income tax returns for the previous year’s earnings. The decision to choose March 1st likely reflected the desire to give taxpayers and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) a reasonable amount of time after the end of the year to prepare and process the tax information.

Revenue Act of 1918: The deadline was changed from March 1st to March 15th by the Revenue Act of 1918, giving taxpayers an additional two weeks to file their returns. This change was part of a broader overhaul of the tax system in response to the financial requirements of World War I.

Revenue Act of 1954: The decision to move the tax filing deadline to April 15th was made as part of the comprehensive tax code overhaul in the Revenue Act of 1954. This shift was influenced by several factors:

  • Administrative Efficiency: The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) needed more time to process the increasing number of returns as the taxpaying population grew. Moving the deadline to mid-April allowed the IRS to manage the workload more effectively.
  • Taxpayer Convenience: Giving taxpayers additional time to compile their financial information, calculate their taxes, and file their returns was seen as a benefit to the public. The extra month aimed to reduce the rush and errors associated with a shorter filing period.
  • Government Cash Flow: The change in deadline also helped in smoothing government cash flows. By adjusting the tax filing schedule, the federal government could better manage its financial resources across the fiscal year.

Influence on our taxes from the 16th Amendment and ratification to the constitution

The 16th Amendment to the United States Constitution played a pivotal role in the evolution of federal taxation by explicitly permitting Congress to levy an income tax without apportioning it among the states according to population. This amendment effectively overcame the limitations imposed by the Supreme Court’s decision in Pollock v. Farmers’ Loan & Trust Co. (1895), which had struck down a portion of the 1894 Income Tax as unconstitutional. The Pollock decision held that taxes on income from property (such as interest, dividends, and rent) were effectively direct taxes and needed to be apportioned among the states according to the Constitution. This ruling made it difficult for the federal government to enact a comprehensive income tax.

The process of ratifying the 16th Amendment was a reflection of the growing public and political support for income taxation as a means to address income inequality and provide a more stable revenue base for the federal government.

  1. Proposal: The amendment was proposed by Congress in 1909, during the presidency of William Howard Taft. It was seen as a way to counter the effects of the Pollock decision and to ensure that the federal government could implement an income tax.
  2. Ratification by the States: After being proposed by Congress, the amendment needed to be ratified by three-fourths of the state legislatures. This requirement meant that at least 36 of the then 48 states needed to approve the amendment.
  3. Completion of Ratification: The ratification process was completed on February 3, 1913, when Delaware became the 36th state to ratify the amendment. With this ratification, the 16th Amendment became part of the Constitution.

The ratification of the 16th Amendment marked a significant transformation in American fiscal policy and the role of the federal government. It allowed for the introduction of the modern federal income tax system with the Revenue Act of 1913. This system provided a more flexible and equitable source of revenue that could grow with the economy and better reflect individuals’ ability to pay. The amendment laid the foundation for the federal government to fund significant social, economic, and defense programs throughout the 20th century and beyond, significantly shaping the relationship between the state and its citizens.

Taxation before 16th Amendment

Colonial Beginnings to Civil War: The Prelude

The concept of taxation in America predates the establishment of the United States, with various forms of taxes imposed by colonial governments. However, the idea of a federal income tax emerged more prominently during the Civil War. To support the war effort, the Revenue Act of 1861 introduced the first federal income tax in the United States. This tax was a flat 3% on incomes above $800, which was later replaced by a more graduated tax structure in 1862. The Civil War tax was a temporary measure and was repealed in 1872.

The Turn of the Century: The 16th Amendment

The late 19th and early 20th centuries were marked by significant economic growth and disparities, leading to calls for a more equitable tax system. The Supreme Court’s 1895 ruling in Pollock v. Farmers’ Loan & Trust Co. effectively made income tax unconstitutional, as it was considered a direct tax not apportioned according to the population of each state. This decision set the stage for the 16th Amendment, ratified in 1913, which explicitly granted Congress the power to impose an income tax without apportionment among the states. The Revenue Act of 1913 introduced a progressive income tax, starting at 1% on taxable income above $3,000 and rising to 7% for incomes over $500,000.

The World Wars: Expansion and Solidification

The World Wars acted as catalysts for significant expansions in the income tax system. To finance military expenditures, the tax base broadened, and rates increased dramatically. By the end of World War II, the top marginal tax rate had soared to 94% on incomes over $200,000. During this period, the current tax withholding system was also introduced to improve tax collection efficiency.

Postwar Era to the Present: Reforms and Controversies

The postwar era saw numerous tax reforms reflecting changing political and economic priorities. The 1950s and 1960s continued with high tax rates to support government spending on social programs and the Cold War. However, the 1980s marked a significant shift towards tax reduction, with the Economic Recovery Tax Act of 1981 and the Tax Reform Act of 1986, both of which lowered individual and corporate tax rates and simplified the tax code.

The turn of the millennium has been characterized by ongoing debates over tax rates, the tax code’s complexity, and the balance between taxation and economic growth. Notable legislation includes the Bush tax cuts in the early 2000s and the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, which once again overhauled the tax system, lowering rates and making significant changes to deductions and corporate taxation.

The Future of Taxation

As we look to the future, the debates surrounding income tax—its rates, structure, and very purpose—remain complex and contentious as ever, reflecting the ongoing dialogue about the role of government, economic equity, and fiscal responsibility in American society.
Predicting the future of taxation in the United States involves considering current trends, economic challenges, and political landscapes. While specific policies and rates may vary, several broader trends can give us insight into the direction in which U.S. taxation might head:

1. Digital Economy and Taxation

  • Digital Services Taxes: With the rise of the digital economy, there’s an ongoing debate on how to effectively tax digital services and companies that operate largely online. The U.S. may consider or refine digital services taxes, similar to those being discussed or implemented in Europe and other parts of the world.
  • Cryptocurrency: The taxation of digital currencies and assets is an evolving area. As cryptocurrencies become more integrated into the financial system, the IRS and lawmakers will likely develop more detailed regulations and guidelines for their taxation.

2. Environmental Taxes

  • Carbon Taxes: In response to climate change, there’s a growing discussion around the implementation of carbon taxes or emissions trading systems (ETS) to incentivize reductions in greenhouse gas emissions. While politically contentious, environmental taxation could become a tool for environmental policy in the future.

3. Wealth and Inequality

  • Wealth Taxes: Economic inequality has led to calls for more progressive taxation measures, including wealth taxes on ultra-high-net-worth individuals. Although politically divisive, the concept of taxing wealth more heavily could gain traction if inequality continues to rise.
  • Capital Gains Taxes: Adjusting capital gains taxes to reduce loopholes and ensure that wealthier individuals pay a fairer share could be a focus. There’s ongoing debate about aligning capital gains tax rates more closely with income tax rates.

4. Simplification and Technology

  • Simplifying the Tax Code: There’s a perennial call for simplifying the complex U.S. tax code to make tax compliance easier for individuals and businesses. This may involve reducing loopholes, consolidating deductions, and making the filing process more straightforward.
  • Technology in Tax Administration: The IRS and taxpayers will likely continue to leverage technology to improve tax filing, processing, and enforcement. Advances in AI and data analytics could make tax collection more efficient and reduce evasion.

5. Global Taxation and Coordination

  • International Tax Agreements: With globalization, there’s a push for more international cooperation to prevent tax evasion and to address the challenges of taxing multinational corporations. The U.S. will be involved in shaping and responding to global tax norms, such as those concerning the minimum corporate tax rates.

6. Response to Economic Challenges

  • Pandemic Recovery and Beyond: The economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and future crises will influence tax policy decisions. Stimulus measures, deficits, and debt levels will require thoughtful balancing of tax policy to support recovery without stifling growth.

While these trends suggest directions in which U.S. tax policy could evolve, the exact nature of future changes will depend on a myriad of factors, including economic conditions, political will, and societal priorities. Taxation is a dynamic and responsive aspect of governance, reflecting and shaping the nation’s economic and social landscape.

Recent Posts

From Battlefield to Boardroom

May 24, 2024|Talent|

In the dynamic landscape of entrepreneurship, veterans are emerging as a formidable force, leveraging their skills, experiences, and tenacity to launch successful startups and drive economic growth.

Bridging Culture Contrasts

May 2, 2024|Talent|

Whether you’re a startup or an established large corporation, understanding the nuances of organizational culture is essential for fostering productivity, innovation, and employee engagement.